9-11 AND CODES
Malcom La Gauche
Of the 459 articles I have written since I began my website, the number that highlighted 9-11 is zero. Most people who write about the Iraqi occupation and U.S. imperialism have delved into the subject of 9-11 frequently. Today, I break my silence.
Although I left the subject to writers who are far more qualified, I knew from moment one that the version given to the public was a bunch of horse merde. The administration knocks those who question the validity of its history of 9-11-01. However, it is their own words that make the scenario seem preposterous. Of all the theories, the U.S. government version is the least believable.
The story that 19 Arabs who at times, according to the U.S. side, were bumbling fools who resembled the Keystone Cops could have taken orders from an insignificant group of Islamic fundamentalists in a cave in Afghanistan and then circumvent the world’s most advanced security systems better fits the realm of science fiction writers, and less-than-medicore ones at that.
At first, the naysayers came forth with scenarios that rivaled those of the administration in their absurdity: aliens from another planet were behind the attacks: God was paying back the U.S. for having too many homos said Pat Robertson.
After a while, the arguments of those who questioned the administration version became more and more plausible. Gone were the kooks who attributed the attacks to an astrological alignment of the stars. In their place came scientists and engineers who put forth arguments based on physics. Also, noted people in the realm of politics began to say that the entire scenario was a setup. Many of the astute people who have come foreword have impeccable credentials and have handfuls of documents to back up their assessments. The theories differ, so, naturally, they all cannot be right. But, there is plenty of information to justify legitimate research.
The U.S. government puts them all in the same basket as those who blame aliens from Pluto for the blowing up of the towers. This ploy was working, but more and more people are beginning to question the party line given that 19 Arabs who are jealous of the U.S. culture and who hate the U.S. took matters into their own hands, under the supervision of "Osama bin-Laden".
By the way, go to the website for the F.B.I. and you will see that Osama bin-Laden is one of the Most Wanted. However, there is nothing about 9-11 in the description of his misdeeds. In June 2006, a reporter, Ed Haas, called the F.B.I. to inquire why he was not wanted for the 9-11 attacks. He was told, "The reason why 9-11 is not mentioned on "Osama bin-Laden's" most wanted page is because the F.B.I. has no hard evidence connecting bin-Laden to 9-11." We all know how bogus the alleged connection between Saddam Hussein and 9-11 was; yet almost 50% of the U.S. public still believes Saddam played a part in the downing of the World Trade Center. How many U.S. citizens know that the F.B.I. has stated that there is no proof of bin-Laden’s participation?
There are many aspects of 9-11 that have been questioned. In a commentary piece for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, a recent commentary brought out the following points. The importance of this is the newspaper involved. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer is not a radical, on-line publication. It is a mainstream newspaper. Once the mainstream picks up a subject that once was only an underground press item, the subject will begin to acquire a life of its own. According to the commentary:
The symmetry between the 9/11 attacks and U.S. policy goals is but the backdrop to the case for government complicity. The picture becomes clearer through considering the following:
Gen. Mahmoud Ahmed, the head of the Pakistani intelligence service, was in Washington when the attacks occurred, conferring with government officials. The Indian press subsequently implicated him in wiring $100,000 to Mohamed Atta, the lead hijacker. When the story broke, he was pressured into retirement at U.S. insistence. His link to the attacks was never pursued
Two FBI agents approached attorney David Schippers with specific foreknowledge about the attacks. His repeated calls to Attorney General John Ashcroft were never returned. An article in New American on March 11, 2002, corroborated the agents' story. They claimed that knowledge of the plot was widespread within the FBI for months before 9/11.
The air defense system breakdown on the day of Sept. 11 was unprecedented. Well-practiced protocols for dealing with suspected hijackings failed to function for an astonishing 90 minutes. The little-known existence of "coincidental" military war games has since been exposed, which undoubtedly caused confusion. And now, the chairman and vice-chairman of the 9/11 Commission claim (in a new book, "Without Precedent") that the military was less than completely honest.
The collapse of steel-frame buildings -- such as the World Trade Center Towers -- due to fire is unprecedented. The collapse of Building 7, which was not hit by a plane, is especially inexplicable. Its collapse late in the afternoon of Sept. 11 exhibited 10 specific features of a controlled demolition, as did the collapse of the Twin Towers. More important, numerous eyewitnesses attest to hearing multiple explosions at the time. And, Steven Jones, a professor at Brigham Young University, discovered Thermate, an incendiary compound, in two molten steel samples taken from the site.
From the beginning, the Bush administration delayed and otherwise impeded the investigation, preferring to focus on the foreign invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq enabled by the attacks.
Those are but some of many indications that together add up to government complicity. In the words of David Ray Griffin, world-renowned theologian and truth advocate, the agenda and events surrounding 9/11 reveal a "deeply perverted value system" at odds with that of the American people. For the sake of the common welfare, the truth behind 9/11 must be exposed.
Recently, I published a two-part interview with Captain Eric May, a 14-year veteran of the U.S. Army, in which he gave compelling evidence of a coverup about the battle for Baghdad Airport in April 2003. He is also well-versed in events for 9-11. He has not only researched the subject, but he has decoded certain aspects. His background in military intelligence has led him to come up with assessments not normally mentioned.
ML: When did you smell a rat about 9-11?
CM: Not until Madrid. I was contacted just before the Madrid bombings by Captain Cross of the U.S. Marines. He was a 9-11 witness and he told me there was a coverup. I didn't believe him. It wasn't until the Madrid bombing occurred and word got out there were 911 days between 9-11 (New York) and 3-11 (Madrid). When that got out, I, like other intelligence soldiers, immediately smelled a rat and started decoding. I realized that these events were not accidental. They carried a date code and the date code was not being discussed or admitted by the government, which argues that the government was indeed setting up the attacks.
ML: Why did they put a code out there knowing people like you may pick it up?
CM: You must have a coding background, or a knowledge of intelligence affairs, or geopolitics. The idea of any code is to be able to talk around the people who aren’t part of the operation.
This is what every commander in the military, all the way down to the sergeant in the squad does. They have what are called encryption manuals. We never in operations in the field, either in training or in combat, just say out loud what we mean. Codes aren’t really complicated. It’s just complicated to accept they’re being used and you're not getting them. Most people can’t accept that there are codes out there right now.
There was a 7-11 Bombay attack, a 9-11 New York attack and a 3-11 Madrid attack. You take the 7-11 Bombay attack and multiply the 7 by 11 and you get 7-7, the number of the London attack. Amman, Jordan was 9-11 backwards. It happened on 11-9. It's all coded.
These were government attacks. Different governments were probably behind them. Jordan was probably "Israel". New York certainly was the U.S., although probably helped by "Israel". "Israel" is the center of the Axis of Evil.
ML: What is the reason for the attacks? To instill fear in people so their own governments can tell them what to do and they just fall right in line?
CM: Of course. To created a sense of panic and dependence on an authoritarian government. These were all events that were intended to get public support for the war on terror. You have to have terror attacks to have a war on terror. They create these events. They schedule them. They use the codes to know how close they're getting. They have deadlines and guidelines.
ML: Other times, numbers come into play. The official body count given by the U.S. government for civilian deaths in Panama, Grenada and Somalia were identical: 202. Each country had 202 deaths. This is no mere coincidence, is it?
CM: Just yesterday, the Pentagon listed a battle count of U.S. military people killed in the entire Iraq war. Of course, these are fabricated figures. I’m getting much higher figures, like 12,000. The number the Pentagon released is 2,749. On the fifth anniversary of 9-11, the Pentagon said they had the same number of soldiers killed in this war that exactly matches the number of people who were killed in the tower. Five years after 9-11 killed 2,749 people, the Pentagon announces the number of people killed in the Iraq war is 2,749. That's a one-in-2,749 coincidence.
ML: Do you think there is a group called "Al-Qaida" doing this?
CM: No. When I was in the Army, there was something called "opposing forces." We abbreviated that to Op4. When you and your guys were going to play the Americans, then me and my guys, who are really part of the same army, and we’re playing the Russians, we act like Russians playing against you in the war games.
You have to have an Op4 to make the exercise work. "Al-Qaida" is the international Op4. If "Israel" gets some brothers together to blow up some Jordanians to set up a war a few months later, which they did on 11-9, that would be the "Israeli" Op4. That would be the "Israeli" agents working. "Al-Qaida" equals Op4. In order to have a global war on terror based on staged events, someone has to play the bad guy. So we use the "Al-Qaida" code to set the events up with the military-industrial complex. The establishment uses the "Al-Qaida" code the same way we might switch to a secondary language. We would be able to communicate in a crowd, yet no one else would know that we were talking about.
ML: Who flew the planes and how?
CM: I think they were electronically-guided, but I’m not standing on it. You don't have to tell me that the planes even hit the thing. You don’t have to tell me the Arabs hijacked it. You don't have to tell me the personalities, because all that’s really the side show. The big show is that the towers came down.
ML: But the side show is what the people are still using to hold onto the myth.
CM: That's because too many people focus on the side show and it needs to be ridiculed and dismissed. It's a red herring: the soap opera of why the suicide bombers went to a titty bar the night before they got killed for God. The story doesn't hold.
The main show is that there was a controlled demolition to bring the towers down.